Blog

  • Mobius Emerging Markets Fund classified as Article 8 Fund

    ‍We are delighted to share with you that the CSSF (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier) has approved the classification of the Mobius Emerging Markets Fund as an Article 8 fund. According to the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), an Article 8 fund is “a fund which promotes, among other characteristics, environmental or social characteristics, or a combination of those characteristics, provided that the companies in which the investments are made follow good governance practices”.

    The SFDR was introduced as part of the European Commission’s 2018 Sustainable Finance Action Plan to improve transparency in the market for sustainable investment products and to prevent greenwashing. It regulates the requirements for financial service providers and owners of financial products to assess and disclose environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations publicly. The aim is to enable investors to better understand, compare and monitor the sustainability characteristics of investment products.

    As a quick reminder, MCP’s investment philosophy utilises an active ownership approach with an emphasis on improving ESG-standards. We do not constrain ourselves to conventional definitions of ESG but also place a heavy emphasis on rigorously assessing corporate culture (ESG+C®). Our engagement with companies is highly focused, with the aim of increasing long-term shareholder value.

    While we are happy to see the fund achieve the Article 8 status and the team’s engagement around improving ESG+C® factors being recognised, the process has also revealed the limitations of this framework. To be able to distribute Article 8 funds to investors with a preference for sustainability as per MiFID II, in addition to promoting environmental and social characteristics, funds will have to invest a percentage of their portfolio sustainably similarly to an Article 9 fund. This triggers additional reporting requirements. The SFDR-mandated disclosure on Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) factors focuses on possible harm that investment decisions may have on sustainability factors. Examples of PAI factors include greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water pollution and gender diversity at the board level.

    The difficulty for emerging markets funds in general—and small- and mid-cap funds in particular–is limited data availability. While many developed market companies are publishing GRI compliant sustainability reports and are on the radar of ESG rating agencies, EM companies are still lagging behind. Furthermore, the EU Commission promotes SFDR aligned reporting for EU-based companies but there is no comparable initiative in emerging markets yet. While the awareness of the importance of sustainability factors is constantly growing in emerging markets, reporting on a set of 14 PAI indicators across the portfolio will prove challenging.

    The team at MCP has created a proprietary framework that uses a variety of publicly available sources to capture material data to assess the ESG+C® performance of each portfolio company. It also engages with companies to improve and make their ESG reporting compliant. The progress the portfolio is making along ESG parameters is tracked in our quarterly reporting. The latest Q3 2022 report is now available on www.esgplusc.com. This data feeds into a tailored action plan for every portfolio holding aiming at improving the companies ESG+C footprint.

    This very customised approach to sustainable investing goes, in our opinion, far beyond a reliance on ESG-ratings. We do not invest in companies which are already ESG leaders but in businesses which have the potential to become such, and we support them actively throughout this process. We would argue that working with these companies on improving their ESG footprint and making their reporting SFDR compliant adds significant shareholder value while reducing potential harm to the environment, employees and other stake holders. This in turn, should make the fund an attractive investment option for investors with sustainability preferences as per MiFID II. However, it remains challenging for a fund like ours to fulfil the data requirements stipulated by the SFDR for sustainable investments for a significant portion of the portfolio.‍‍

    Footnote: As per SFDR definition, a sustainable investment is an economic activity that contributes to an environmental or social objective.Image: unsplash.com

  • Award-winning Mobius takes cautious approach to emerging markets

    One of the many deserving winners of Citywire’s Investment Trust Awards last week was Mobius (MMIT). True, it has given back about 17.5% of its net asset value over the past 12 months, but its track record since its launch in October 2018 is very good, with an underlying investment return of 24.7% versus 1.2% for the MSCI Emerging Markets index and 10.4% for the MSCI Frontier Markets benchmark. Only BlackRock Frontier Markets (BRFI) has done better.The poor performance of emerging markets this year largely boils down to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and China’s rigid adherence to its zero-Covid policy. Emerging market funds caught with Russian exposure quickly found that it was valueless; repeated lockdowns constrained Chinese demand and caused further damage to supply chains; soaring energy costs impacted energy importers; rampant inflation took hold in some countries and the US responded by raising rates, which strengthened the US dollar – which is always a negative for emerging markets. Investors have exited in droves and valuations are low.

    This tale of woe also points us in the direction of the way out of this. Peace in Ukraine, a relaxation/abandonment of China’s zero-Covid policy, or signs that US rates have peaked could all lead to a sharp rally in emerging markets. However, MMIT fund manager Carlos Hardenberg does not see a quick end to the sector’s problems and the portfolio is positioned accordingly.

    Hardenberg has just come back from Turkey, which is conducting a so far highly unsuccessful experiment of fighting inflation with low interest rates. He observes that companies can adapt to the oddest of circumstances. Many are struggling, but there are some winners and that gives him ideas for what to look out for elsewhere.

    For example, Turkey is benefiting from the trend for near-shoring – bringing production of goods back from Asia and closer to European markets. Hardenberg says that Brazil provides another example of companies that have had to learn to co-exist with a dysfunctional government. He does not see much impact from Lula’s re-election beyond encouraging foreign investors, who have deserted the country in droves, to reappraise the situation.

    Hardenberg and co-manager Mark Mobius pay close attention to the macroeconomic outlook when deciding on the shape of the portfolio. They also operate with a strong ESG focus and this influences their exposures. One obvious benefit of this was that MMIT had no investments in Russia at the time of the invasion – this gave a great boost to its relative returns.

    Similarly, as the managers find it hard to identify attractive Chinese companies that also measure up on governance grounds, the trust also has an underweight exposure there. MMIT had no exposure to the Chinese educational sector – which was wiped out overnight last year when government policy changed – or to the big tech companies which were knocked by regulatory clampdowns. Other areas that they are avoiding currently include Argentina and Egypt.

    The managers’ caution has led them to have quite a high cash weighting of over 13% at the end of September and no gearing. This means that the trust is well positioned to pick up bargains as they appear.

    Another major trend of 2022 has been the resurgence of value relative to growth. MMIT had over half its portfolio invested in the technology sector as of 30 September, and this may have been a headwind to returns this year. Much of the technology exposure is software related, with EPAM Systems the largest position in the portfolio at 9.2% of assets. The US-based digital transformation company just released a strong set of third-quarter numbers and a positive outlook for the rest of the year yet is less than half the price it was at the end of 2021.

    Other top 10 holdings in this area include management software providers TOTVS in Brazil and Persistent Systems in India. These accounted for 5.8% and 5.4% of net assets, according to the September factsheet.

    Hardenberg also sees an opportunity in the area of semiconductors, where buoyant share prices – linked to shortages – have now slumped and valuations are more reasonable despite growing end demand. MMIT backs fabless semiconductor businesses rather than capital-heavy foundries. There is no Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, for example, which features heavily in some competing portfolios. In fact, MMIT has a distinct bias away from the heavyweight companies that dominate emerging market indices and an active share of around 98% relative to the MSCI Emerging Markets index.

    While MMIT had just 8% of its portfolio in China at the end of September, it does have some exposure to Chinese consumers through companies such as Hong Kong-based EC Healthcare (medical and dental clinics, aesthetic procedures), which is expanding into the mainland. MMIT engages with the companies that it holds – on issues as diverse as sustainability, minority shareholder rights, management reward structures, diversity and equality. Sometimes the simplest things can have big rewards – such as persuading a Korean company to translate investor information into English, which helped attract a wider shareholder base and got it re-rated.

    MMIT’s portfolio is fairly concentrated with 24 holdings and turnover tends to be low. It trades on a fairly tight discount – currently 4% below net asset value – a benefit of being one of the better-performing trusts in its peer group. In other times, it would have been the natural rollover vehicle for funds exiting the sector, such as Fundsmith Emerging Equities (FEET). Unfortunately, this year’s turmoil prevented that. I would like to see it grow, however.‍

    View Article

  • Investing for growth – How investment companies can help investors’ finances grow

    The Association of Investment Companies (AIC) has released a new video called ‘Investing for growth’ to help investors understand what growth investing is and how it could help them achieve their financial goals.

    Though growth investing is firmly out of favour, it remains an important way for investors to benefit from technological, social and demographic change. In the short video, investment company managers from the Global Emerging Markets, North America and Technology & Media sectors explain why they are excited about investing for growth.

    The video also explains why investment companies are particularly well suited for growth investing. This is because their closed-ended structure allows managers to take the long view and hold investments for years, without the risk that they will have to sell them to meet redemptions.

    The video features clips from:

    • Kirsty Gibson, Investment Manager of Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust
    • Ewan Lovett-Turner, Head of Investment Company Research at Numis
    • Ben Rogoff, Investment Manager of Polar Capital Technology Trust
    • Carlos von Hardenberg, Investment Manager of Mobius Investment Trust

    Annabel Brodie-Smith, Communications Director of the Association of Investment Companies (AIC), said: “Global growth may be slowing, but investment company managers are able to seek out the most exciting opportunities wherever they are in the world. We made this video to introduce the idea of growth investing to people who are seeking to save for the long term – whether for their own retirement, their children’s future, or for a special holiday or purchase.

    “There are lots more guides and videos on the AIC website to help investors who want to find out more. However, investment companies won’t suit everyone. Those who aren’t sure what investments might be right for them should consult an independent financial adviser.”

  • Recording: MCP Investor Day 2022

    Please find a recording of the event at the bottom of this page. For Professional Investors only

    On the 14th November 2022, MCP hosted the Mobius Capital Partners Investor Day 2022 at the Royal Society of Chemistry, Piccadilly, London. MCP’s Founding Partner Carlos Hardenberg provided an update on the team, portfolio, strategy and performance for the Mobius Emerging Markets Fund and the Mobius Investment Trust and gave an outlook for H2 2022 and beyond. Portfolio companies Persistent Systems, a leading Indian software business and EC Healthcare, the largest non-hospital health care chain in Hong Kong presented their respective businesses virtually, provided an outlook for the coming years and talked about their progress on ESG+C efforts and their involvement and engagement with the Mobius Capital Partners team.

    The Companies

    Persistent Systems is a fast-growing developer of digital platforms for enterprises across industries such as software, financial services and life sciences in developed markets. The company is a leader in developing software for major software companies, including IBM, Google and Salesforce, and is rapidly growing in developing digital platforms and applications. Persistent Systems also licenses IP in these areas.

    Established in 2005 and listed in Hong Kong in March 2016, EC Healthcare is Hong Kong’s largest non-hospital medical service provider focusing on preventive and precision medicine. The Group currently operates 147 service points, providing one-stop medical and healthcare services. EC Healthcare also has operations in mainland China and Macau. 

    The Speakers

    Sandeep Kalra, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director, Persistent Systems

    Sandeep Kalra is the Chief Executive Officer of Persistent Systems and serves on its Board as an Executive Director. Under his leadership, Persistent is transforming from a niche technology player into a multifaceted, new age digital transformation partner and a strong global brand.

    After graduating from Indian Institute of Management in Calcutta, Sandeep spent 16+ years with HCL, where he held multiple leadership positions across Outsourced Product Engineering, establishing HCL Technologies in LATAM and Canada as well as leading the Pharma vertical. Subsequently to HCL Technologies, Sandeep joined Symphony Teleca to lead its growth and was instrumental in its successful acquisition by HARMAN. Sandeep then led a 7,000+ member services business unit for HARMAN (now a Samsung Company), delivering digital transformation solutions to ISVs and enterprises.

    Leslie LuCo-Chief Executive Officer & Executive Director, EC Healthcare

    Leslie Lu is co-leading EC Healthcare with a focus on the group’s strategy, systems building, implementation and cultural alignment. Leslie has over 20 years experience in corporate operations, risk management and client relationship management. He previously held various managerial positions at Cathay Pacific, before taking on the role of Deputy Chief Digital Officer at Sun Hung Kai Real Estate Agency Limited.


    Leslie graduated from The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) with a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering and holds a master’s degree in Global Finance from New York University and HKUST.

    Mark Mobius, Founding Partner, Mobius Capital Partners

    Dr. Mobius has spent over 40 years working in and travelling throughout emerging and frontier markets. During this time he has been in charge of actively managed funds totalling over $50 billion in assets. Prior to launching Mobius Capital Partners LLP in May 2018, Dr. Mobius was with Franklin Templeton Investments for more than 30 years, most recently as executive chairman of the Templeton Emerging Markets Group.

    During his tenure, the group expanded assets under management from US$100 million to over US$50,000 million and launched a number of emerging market and frontier funds focusing on Asia, Latin America, Africa and Eastern Europe. In addition to open-end and closed-end mutual funds, he launched a successful series of emerging market private equity funds.

    Carlos von Hardenberg Founding Partner, Mobius Capital Partners

    Carlos Hardenberg is the co-founder of Mobius Capital Partners and has been Portfolio Manager of the strategy since inception in 2018. Carlos spent 17 years with Franklin Templeton Investments starting as a research analyst based in Singapore, focusing on South East Asia. He then went on to live and work in Poland before moving to Istanbul, Turkey for ten years. Carlos has spent extensive time travelling in Asia, Latin America, Africa and Eastern Europe researching companies and identifying investment targets.

    He managed country, regional and global emerging and frontier market portfolios and was appointed lead manager of the LSE-listed Templeton Emerging Market Trust PLC in 2015. Carlos successfully managed the fund and generated significant outperformance over the entire period of his leadership. He also established and managed one of the largest global frontier market funds for a decade.

  • RECORDING: Mobius Capital Partners | MEMF Strategy Update Webinar

    Held on 4 October 2022

    For Professional Investors only

    On the 4 October 2022, MCP hosted a webinar for institutional investors for the Mobius Emerging Markets Fund. On this occasion, MCP’s founding partner Carlos Hardenberg provided an update on the strategy, performance and portfolio of the fund and shared his views on the challenges and opportunities in emerging markets in 2022 and beyond.The video below is a recording of the webinar.Please email Anna von Hahn at anna@mcp-em.com should you have any questions or would like further information.

  • The 20th Party Congress of the Communist Party of China and beyond

    The Communist Party of China (CCP) plans to host the 20th Party Congress in Beijing on October 16 this year. Since 1977, the Congress takes place every five years. It is the most important event on the Party’s agenda because the new composition of the top-level leadership will be announced. Beijing’s political, economic and foreign policy priorities for the next five years and beyond will also be established. Two thousand three hundred representatives will participate in this major political event. They are nominated and elected from 38 provincial and regional units, central government bureaus, state-owned enterprises and the public financial system. The Congress is a tightly scripted event, as every decision, statement and personnel appointment is decided ahead of time following extensive closed-door negotiations [1].

    At the centre of attention is the highly anticipated announcement of President Xi’s third term in office. Xi was elected president of China in 2013 and was initially supposed to step down by the end of 2022, as the maximum tenure for a president is two five-year terms. However, in March 2018, the Congress amended China’s constitution to roll back presidential term limits, paving the way for Xi to remain in power beyond 2022. Some observers anticipate that Xi, currently 69 years old, could stay in office for another three terms and retire in 2037 at the age of 84, given that 2035 marks the first milestone for many of Xi’s political goals to achieve “socialist modernisation” by 2050 [2].

    Despite having a single ruling party, informal factions built upon personal relationships divide power inside the Party [i] . Several observations indicate that Xi has strengthened his position within the Party since becoming president, especially as factional rivals have been removed in a series of anti-corruption measures[3]. At the 19th Party Congress, the Xi Jinping Thought was added to the fundamental doctrines of the CCP and the country’s constitution, following the Mao Zedong Thought and the Deng Xiaoping Theory, making Xi the third name to appear in the principles[4].

    The Xi Jinping Thought has also been part of the ethics and politics curricula in primary, middle and high school since the autumn of 2021 [5]. Xi also broke an unspoken tradition of the Party established in 1992 during the Deng Xiaoping era – the incumbent president always internally nominates the presidential successor, and the previous president’s nominee ought to be appointed to the Standing Committee of the Politburo (PSC), China’s highest decision-making body, for a “grooming term” prior to the transition of power. It is believed that the continuing influence of the current president’s faction can be constrained by skipping one presidential shift (ten years) in the appointment of the presidential candidate. At the 19th Party Congress, when Xi ought to have appointed former president Hu’s nominees, he did not do so. One of the two politicians believed to have been nominated by Hu – Sun Zhengcai – was given a life sentence as a result of the anti-corruption movement in 2018, and the other– Hu Chunhua, also the current vice premier of China and a member of the Politburo — is an anticipated nominee to succeed Li Keqiang as premier. However, Hu Chunhua did not receive a seat on the PSC in 2017’s Party Congress, and Xi could try to block his promotion to become the premier despite his qualifications.

    The standing committee of the Political Bureau (PSC) consists of the country’s highest-ranking leaders and is the most important decision-making body regarding major policy issues. Changes in the composition of the PSC are anticipated to be announced at the 20th Party Congress, and the announcement will have profound implications on China’s political stability and Xi’s ability to push through his policy programs. The PSC currently has seven members, including President Xi. Power is divided as follows: Xi and his allies Li Zhanshu and Zhao Leji have three of the seven seats. Premier Li Keqiang and Chairman of the Political Consultative Conference Wang Yang are believed to not belong to Xi’s circle and are often more associated with the former president Hu Jintao. The two remaining members seem to have a neutral standing among factions [6]. There is no official rule which limits the number of terms for PSC members, but, according to the unwritten Party tradition since President Jiang Zeming, any member who turns 68 by the time of the Party Congress must retire from the PSC but can stay for another term if he is only 67 by the time of the event [7]. By this rule, except for Xi, two incumbent members – Han Zheng (68) and Li Zhanshu (72) – ought to retire. The following scenarios would indicate an increase in Xi’s power within the Party: 1) Xi is able to place his allies in the two positions to gain a majority; 2) Xi breaks the unspoken tradition and extends Li Zhanshu’s term; 3) Xi adds additional members to PSC to dilute Li Keqiang’s and Wang Yang’s relative power in the PSC. Eight of the other eighteen Politburo members will also retire based on the age rule, and the extent of Xi’s ability to replace these seats with allies will also reflect on his influence within the Party. The people replacing these seats will enter China’s most senior leadership councils and have a direct impact on policy.

    The CCP and China’s Government (Source: U.S.- China Business Council; CFR research)

    The 20th Party Congress will reflect on the progress made since the 19th Party Congress in 2017 and set policy goals and priorities for the next five years and beyond. Details regarding specific policies will roll out following these directions, as departmental- and provincial-level government create their own five-year plans aligning to the top-level goals. In the last Party Congress, Xi announced that China had successfully achieved the goal set by paramount leader Deng Xiaoping in 1979, of building a moderately prosperous society [8]. In contrast to previous leaders’ emphasis on a “peaceful and quiet rise”, Xi has taken a more assertive approach, envisioning China becoming a “fully developed, rich and powerful” nation with international influence by 2049 and entitling himself as the leader of this movement [9].

    The CCP has worked to achieve this by modernising its military, pursuing extensive land reclamation efforts on disputed islands in the South China Sea, investing billions of dollars in countries worldwide through its massive Belt and Road Initiative, and taking on a more active role in international institutions [10]. In the 13th Chapter of Xi Jinping Thought related to economic growth, Xi highlights that China is in the economic transition from volume and export-driven growth to qualitative, innovation- and efficiency improvement-driven growth, at a mid-to-high expansion rate.. The government also plays a crucial role in resource allocation of the economy, while it encourages the vitality of both state-owned enterprises and the private sector. In terms of foreign policy, China continues the Belt and Road Initiative, encourages Chinese companies to invest overseas, and believes that globalisation is inevitable. Xi also reinforces the effectiveness of China’s “one country, two policy” strategy on governing Macau and Hong Kong, and is determined on “one China policy” on the issue of Taiwan [11]. Critique and scepticism around China’s Covid policy and worsening China-US relations are identified as two crucial challenges for Xi and his leadership [12].

    What will happen once Xi is re-elected?

    • Zero-Covid

    The Chinese government chose to prioritise lives over economic activities and growth, a policy that was effective in the first year of the Covid-19 outbreak but now causes the economy to lag its Asian and global peers. We should not anticipate a drastic pivot away from the current zero-Covid policy immediately following the conference. However, some publicised policy suggestions and official announcements indicate that a gradual and a successive international reopening can be expected [13]. We are starting to see first signs. Recently, Hong Kong removed the travel quarantine rules for international travellers after months of lockdown.

    • China–Taiwan

    The expected continuation of Xi’s regime increases the key man risk, as Xi could view China’s reunification with Taiwan as a personal political goal. However, we view a Chinese military invasion at the current stage as unlikely, because the negative consequences would impact China’s long-term economic prospects, a price too high to pay. China is still dependent on Taiwan’s semiconductor know-how and manufacturing capacity, and a military action against Taiwan could damage capacity and interrupt production, negatively impacting global supply chains. Furthermore, China could face wide-ranging international sanctions and lose foreign investment. Finally, Taiwan is not Ukraine. It is a fortified island with strengthening military intelligence and defence capabilities, which have been bolstered by growing US commitment to the territory. Today, Taiwan and China are more economically integrated than ever before. Since travel restrictions have been fully relaxed in 2008, and investment restrictions were lifted the year after, the two regions developed significant cross trade from US$11bn in 2001 to over US$166bn today. We are monitoring the situation very carefully and are in close contact with our companies and experts on the ground in China and Taiwan.

    • Economic Policy

    As indicated in the 14th five-year plan of the CCP, we expect China will continue its transition phase under a re-elected President Xi with a focus on improving factor productivity and technology independence. In Xi Jinping Thought the President pointed out that China needs to focus on supply-side problems, including overcapacity on low-end supply and scarcity of high-end supply, as well as dependency on foreign high-tech equipment and technology. The recently announced US export controls on advanced semiconductor chips and manufacturing equipment will very likely accelerate the ongoing efforts of the Chinese government to decrease its dependence on high-end chip imports. In the short term, we expect the government’s pragmatic focus on reigniting growth, supporting internal demand and ensuring stability to continue.

    How do we invest in China?

    While no emerging market investor can afford to ignore China, we invest very conservatively in the country. A complex regulatory environment, corporate governance issues and a retail-driven market (70% of equity trading value) are among some of the biggest challenges, especially for the A-share market. Currently, we prefer to get exposure to China’s growing demand for products such as semiconductors, consumer electronics, premium health care and renewable energy through investments in Taiwan, South Korea and Hong Kong. These financial markets are more mature and provide better governance and transparency.

    A good example is one of our largest investments, Hong Kong-based EC Healthcare, which operates private medical, aesthetics and veterinary clinics in Hong Kong and China. The company profits from an experienced management team and good governance as well as access to China’s growing market for quality health care. MCP used the recent weakness in the share price, which had been impacted by the Hong Kong lockdown to add to the position. EC Healthcare is Hong Kong’s largest non-hospital medical service provider, and is rapidly expanding organically and through M&As. The company is well positioned to benefit from the border reopening and the recovery of medical and aesthetics tourism.

    We are delighted that EC Healthcare will be presenting their business, outlook, and progress on ESG factors at the MCP Investor Day 2022 (for Professional Investors only) on Monday, 14 November at 11am (GMT) at the Royal Society of Chemistry, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BA. This will be an in-person event with the option to join via Zoom. We would be delighted to welcome you on this occasion.

    Footnotes

    [1] Cunningham, M. (2022, March 7). Looking Ahead to China’s 20th Party Congress. Retrieved from The Heritage Foundation: https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/looking-ahead-chinas-20th-party-congress

    [2] Thomas, N. (2020, October 26). China Politics 2025: Stronger as Xi Goes. Retrieved from Macro Polo:https://macropolo.org/analysis/china-forecast-politics-2025-stronger-as-xi-jinping-goes/

    [3] Some examples include the life imprisonments of ZhouYongkang, a former member of the 17t PSC in 2015, Sun Zhengcai,former member of the Politburo and highly anticipated candidate to the PSC in2018, Ling Jihua, former principal political advisor to Hu in 2016, and,famously, Bo Xilai, former Mayor of Dalian and Minister of Commerce.

    [4] Buckley,C. (2017, October 24). China Enshrines ‘Xi Jinping Thought,’ Elevating Leader to Mao-Like Status. Retrieved from New York Times:https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/24/world/asia/china-xi-jinping-communist-party.html

    [5] Ministryof Education of the P.R China. (2021,July 8). 《习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想学生读本》于今年秋季学期起在全国统一使用. Retrieved from Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China:http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/s5987/202107/t20210708_543195.html

    [6] These include the principal adviser Wang Huning, who has advised Xi and his two presidential predecessors Jiang and Hu; and Han Zheng, who was previously the Party Secretary of Shanghai and is believed to be associated with former president Jiang Zeming.

    [7] Fang, B.(2022, August 20). 二十大报道:习近平连任挑战和政治局常委布局. Retrieved from VOA:https://www.voachinese.com/a/xi-jinping-standing-committee-members-20th-party-congress/6709178.html

    [8]The moderately prosperous society is defined by sixteen quantified standards related to income, minimum average housing size, infrastructure, forest coverage, literacy rate, education spending, protein consumption, and life expectancy (Central Compilation and Translation Press, 2021).

    [9] Xinhua Net . (2017, October 23). [十九大“新”观察]“新目标”怎么干?. Retrieved from Xinhua Net:http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/19cpcnc/2017-10/23/c_129724802.htm

    [10] Albert, E., Maizland, L., & Xu, B. (2021, June 23). The Chinese Communist Party. Retrieved from Council on Foreign Relations: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinese-communist-party

    [11] Xinhua net. (2021). 习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想三十讲课件. Retrieved from Xinhua Net:http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/xjpsxkj/

    [12]Cunningham, M. (2022, March 7). Looking Ahead to China’s 20th Party Congress. Retrieved from The Heritage Foundation:https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/looking-ahead-chinas-20th-party-congress

    [13]Sources include the Suggestions on the revival of international tourism under the normalization of epidemic prevention and control, which advocates for are-opening of touristic regions to international travellers, March 2022; and the 14t Five-year plan publicised by the Civil Aviation Administration of China in 2021 that classifies 2021–2022 as a recovery phase and 2023–2025 as an expansion and growth phase, attached with specific quantified milestones.

    [i] A common generalisation divides factions into the “elites” and the “populists”. The “elites” are descendants of former Party members and typically come from political centres such as Beijing and Shanghai. They are generally believed to place greater focus on economic development. Xi Jinping,  son of Xi Zhongxun, who once served as deputy prime minister of China and was an early comrade-in-arms of Mao Zedong, belongs to the “elites”. Xi’s predecessor, former President Hu Jintao, was a “populist”, also known as “tuanpai”. Politicians from this faction places higher emphasis on social equality and have commonly started their political career from the Chinese Communist Youth League – the party’s nation-wide organisation for youth aged 14–28 to study and a training ground for party cadres (Lai, 2012). Party elders are considered to be influential due to their mentor-protégé relationships with incumbent leaders, forming clans such as the “Shanghai clique” or the “Beijing clique”.