”It’s not what happens to you, but how you react that matters.”

Epictetus

Dear Fellow MMIT Shareholder,

This year reminded us what active investing truly means — to act when necessary, to be patient when appropriate, and to hold conviction when it stands tested, revisited, and reaffirmed under new circumstances.

Active investing can also mean diverging from the market — sometimes sharply. That divergence can be uncomfortable in the short term, as it has been this year, but it is also what drives long-term results. By definition, active investing means being different from the benchmark, taking positions built on conviction, not composition, and aiming to deliver differentiated and sustainable returns. In previous years, the same approach led to significant outperformance, and we believe it has once again left the portfolio better positioned for what lies ahead. Our focus remains unchanged: we aim to invest in high-quality, well managed companies that compound value over time and align with our strategy and responsible investment principles.

Portfolio companies have shown the same proactive spirit. CarTrade for example, expanded through the OLX integration and doubled its user reach; E Ink committed to new capacity for next-generation displays; TOTVS continued to build on its strategic acquisition of StoneCo’s Linx unit to strengthen its leadership in enterprise retail software; and Park Systems continued to broaden its nanotechnology tools across industries, just to name a few.

This spirit and innovation is clearly paying off as companies across the portfolio have delivered strong Q2 reports with many beating expectation and upgrading their outlooks for the coming years. CarTrade’s revenue increased by 22% YoY and Profit After Tax increased 106% YoY; E Ink’s revenue increased by 35% YoY and gross margin increased by 60% (+15pp); TOTVS’ earnings beat their EPS estimate by +1.6%; and Park Systems’ revenue increased by 17% YoY, 5% ahead of Bloomberg consensus.

Fundamentals Should Drive Recovery: Q2 2025 Reports

Despite these strong company-level results, this year has been challenging, with gains concentrated in benchmark-heavy countries and sectors. Tariff-related uncertainty in the first half of the year pushed investors toward “safe havens,” while in emerging markets, value outperformed quality as capital rotated into lower-valuation, more defensive sectors like financials amid EM rate cuts. A defence-led rally boosted industrials, and China’s stimulus- and liquidity-driven rebound lifted the benchmark.

Meanwhile, our overweight in software weighed on performance as companies delayed IT projects in a volatile environment. In general, much of the rally in emerging markets this year has been driven by a handful of mega-cap stocks, while less-known companies have attracted less investor attention. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is up approximately 28% year-to-date, with internal analysis suggesting that the top ten Asian technology names account for almost half of these gains¹.

In Q2, we began to see early signs of a potential reversal, indicating that recent portfolio headwinds may have been cyclical. This view is cautiously supported by improving macro conditions — including easing tariff volatility, momentum in AI and technology, further interest rate cuts, and a declining USD — as well as country-specific catalysts in India, Taiwan, Korea, and Brazil. While these factors could provide a more supportive backdrop, we expect any recovery to become clearer over the course of next year as these trends gradually come into play.

The quarter began with renewed tariff uncertainty as President Trump again delayed the implementation of reciprocal tariffs, allowing time for several major trade deals to be struck with the EU, Korea, and Japan. Finally, tariffs took effect on 1 August across more than 90 countries, hitting India and Brazil hardest at 50%. Since then, trade-related volatility has eased, and markets have reacted less sharply to new tariff announcements than earlier in the year, when smaller emerging-market stocks were disproportionately affected as investors rotated into larger, lower-valued names and other perceived safe-haven assets amid heightened uncertainty.

EM Quality has Fallen Behind EM Value YTD

During the early-year volatility, we increased our exposure to existing high-conviction names and selectively added new names from our watchlist by taking advantage of attractive valuations and temporary dislocations from companies that we believe were unfairly impacted by broader market sentiment. With tariff related volatility likely subsiding, quality names, should now be better placed for a recovery.

The technology sector once again outperformed most other sectors globally, driving gains in both the US and China. Strong Q2 results from US hyperscalers and confirmation of continued large-scale AI capital expenditure reignited confidence in AI-led growth. To put this into perspective, the Guardian reported that Big Tech has invested more than $155 billion in AI this year² — roughly equivalent to the cost of building the International Space Station. Meanwhile, policy support for domestic chipmakers and new AI product launches from China’s leading technology firms have fuelled a rally in Chinese and Hong Kong tech stocks.

Hyperscaler Capex Driving AI Momentum

This strength in US and Chinese technology has also supported companies, including many in our portfolio, in emerging markets like Taiwan and South Korea which play vital roles in AI supply chains. For example, NVIDIA’s Rubin GPU rollout and rising ASIC volumes are boosting demand across the semiconductor supply chain, benefitting companies such as Elite Material, a global leader in high-performance copper clad laminates used in printed circuit boards. In its Q2 report, Elite announced an additional round of capacity expansion in 2026 due to strong demand, with revenue up 40% YoY. Other examples include Chroma raising its guidance for system-level testing revenue in light of rising demand from leading ASIC and GPU projects.

Other positive macro news for emerging markets comes in the form of the Federal Reserve’s first interest rate cut of the year this September, with rates now targeted at 4-4.25%. Fed officials also hinted that further rate cuts would follow in the remainder of the year. Lower US interest rates tend to benefit emerging markets by making lower yielding developed market assets less attractive, potentially prompting investors to seek higher returns in EMs some of which are also experiencing moderating local inflation, lower public debts and higher real rates. This can boost foreign direct investment and support EM asset prices. However, the impact is uneven, as greater risk appetite and lower US yields cannot fully offset weak macroeconomic conditions or poor corporate fundamentals in certain markets. Nevertheless, the continuation of the downward trajectory of global rate cuts should be positive for emerging markets overall.

Within our key markets, local factors are at play indicating the potential for country-level recoveries. Taiwan should benefit from the global AI momentum mentioned above with its global leadership in advanced semiconductors underpinning both industry demand and geopolitical importance. Korea should profit from a semiconductor recovery, as well as governance reforms and its Value Up initiative which is creating potential to unlock shareholder value by improving governance and capital allocation.

Meanwhile, India’s combination of fiscal prudence, resilient domestic consumption grounded in a young population, moderating inflation, and pro-growth policy support creates a constructive macro backdrop underpinning the country’s long term, high growth trajectory. In Brazil, while we expect volatility ahead of the 2026 elections, there is a clear path towards SELIC rate cuts and normalisation of real interest rates which would provide a catalyst for the Brazilian equities market.

China Rally Driven by Multiple Expansion, Not EPS Growth

While China has dominated headlines this year with a strong market rebound placing it among the top-performing countries, we believe the rally has been driven primarily by sentiment and policy stimulus, rather than underlying fundamentals, as reflected in persistently weak economic data this quarter. The lack of a clear recovery in the real economy raises questions about the rally’s sustainability. Additionally, the rally has been largely concentrated in the tech sector which is now trading at less attractive valuations. For these reasons, we continue to exercise caution. We have been carefully screening the Chinese market across select sectors to identify companies that meet our stringent quality and governance standards. While only a few appear potentially aligned with these criteria, we remain disciplined and will continue our search without compromising on quality.

Overall, as we reflect on the year, we are reminded of Epictetus’ words: “It’s not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters.” While this year has presented significant challenges, it has only strengthened our conviction in both our strategy and our portfolio companies. Rather than being discouraged by volatility, we used it as an opportunity to deepen our positions in high-quality, well-managed businesses.

By staying disciplined and true to our active, conviction-driven approach, we believe we are now well positioned to benefit from key macro, country and sector specific tailwinds over the coming years. Reflecting this confidence, the team has increased its investment in the strategy — a clear signal of our optimism about the future of our portfolio companies and the opportunities ahead in emerging markets which we intend to capitalise on.

1. Bloomberg, MSCI ↩︎
2. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/02/big-tech-ai-spending ↩︎

”Markets Love Volatility”

Christine Lagarde

Dear Fellow MMIT Shareholder,

Throughout the past quarter—and indeed the entire year—we have experienced significant market volatility, driven in large part by shifting U.S. trade policies under the Trump administration, which have fuelled considerable uncertainty. Volatility peaked following the 2 April announcement of extraordinarily high, sweeping ‘reciprocal’ tariffs. This announcement shocked global markets, triggering sharp selloffs with some of the steepest price movements in decades. The subsequent pause of the tariffs to 9 July seemed only to confirm the erratic nature of U.S. policies, a sentiment further validated by the recent extension to 1 August.

Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions—including the ongoing war in the Ukraine and the escalating conflict in the Middle East—have added further layers of complexity to the global macro environment. Several emerging markets have faced their own significant challenges: India experienced a sharp market downturn in January and February; South Korea continued to navigate political instability following last year’s failed attempt to impose martial law; and Turkey came under renewed pressure after the arrest of President Erdogan’s main opposition leader. Finally, the surprise release of the Chinese chatbot DeepSeek introduced unexpected competitive dynamics in the global AI landscape, further unsettling investor sentiment.

Smaller, high-quality companies, particularly in the technology sector, were disproportionately affected by the uncertainty as investors fled to safe heaven assets like gold but also to the larger, more liquid names deemed to be less risky. Furthermore, amidst the volatility, we observed a market rotation into sectors such as banks and commodities. These areas, which we deliberately exclude from the portfolio due to their regulatory complexity, capital intensity, and limited pricing power, had already been trading at low valuations and therefore proved more resilient during recent market corrections.

Our portfolio is benchmark-agnostic, with an active share close to 100%, reflecting our high-conviction, bottom-up stock selection. While this naturally leads to periods of return divergence against the broader market, we believe it positions us well to deliver meaningful long-term outperformance for investors. We’ve navigated challenging periods before, such as in 2019 and 2022, and in both instances, the trust went on to deliver strong (out-)performance in the years that followed. As the dislocation begins to correct, MMIT’s NAV and share price have started to recover, delivering 6.5% and 5.2% in GBP terms over the quarter. Since inception, the trust has delivered a NAV return of 54.8%.

MMIT is one of the Leading EM Trusts Over the Past 5 Years*

We viewed the recent market pullback as an opportunity to further strengthen the portfolio. We selectively added high-conviction names from our watchlist, taking advantage of attractive valuations and temporary dislocations. Active portfolio management has remained central to our day-to-day work: we trimmed or exited positions where, in our view, the macro environment had materially weakened the investment case and redeployed capital into more compelling opportunities. At the same time, we increased exposure to several high-conviction holdings that had been unfairly impacted by broader market sentiment.

Encouragingly, many of our portfolio companies delivered strong Q1 results, with several beating expectations and issuing positive forward guidance, despite ongoing uncertainty.

Strong Q1 Results, Optimistic Outlook for 2025 & Beyond

Our extensive on-the-ground research this year—spanning visits to Taiwan, India and Korea—provided valuable insight and generated a number of promising new ideas. India stands out as a particularly strong focus for us. We took advantage of market weakness earlier this year to add undervalued names, supported by an improving macro backdrop that includes rate cuts, easing inflation, and increased liquidity in the banking sector.

Economic Indicators Point to Continued Recovery in India

In Korea, the outcome of the 3 June elections brought political stability, which has boosted stock performance. The new government is pursuing a broad agenda of market-friendly reforms, not only to tackle the longstanding ‘Korea discount’, but also to enhance overall corporate governance, capital efficiency, and investor confidence. As a result, new opportunities are emerging, particularly in the technology sector. Brazil has also remained on our radar, with compellingly low valuations, improving macro fundamentals, and a strengthening real contributing to a more constructive outlook.

From a sector perspective, we have been active as well. In health care, we began reducing our position in Korean medical aesthetics company Classys after realising significant profits over the course of the holding period. In industrials, we added to APL Apollo and bought KEI Industries in India to capitalise on Indian infra and energy capex demands.

In consumer discretionary, we added CarTrade given its dominant position in car classifieds in India catering towards local consumption growth. We remain bullish on the technology sector; however, the composition of our tech holdings has been thoughtfully realigned to reflect our evolving views amid current macroeconomic challenges, broader market trends, and shifting IT spending priorities.

Following the ‘DeepSeek scare’ —when Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek introduced a large language model (LLM) with performance on par with Western counterparts but developed at significantly lower cost—Q1 results from hyperscale cloud providers such as Amazon and Alphabet reaffirmed the robust momentum of AI-related investment. The reality remains that businesses globally are accelerating their transition toward AI-driven models, necessitating sustained, large-scale investment in compute infrastructure. Encouragingly, many of our portfolio companies in the technology sector echoed this trend in their Q1 earnings reports, providing constructive guidance for the year ahead and pointing to an emerging rebound in demand, driven by renewed strength in AI-related spending.

For example, Chroma, a Taiwanese supplier of testing equipment, beat Bloomberg earnings consensus by 48% driven by a 11% increase in operating margin year-on-year, and a 55% year-on-year revenue growth. Demand for Chroma’s power testers was supported by China’s aggressive AI datacentre build out, and the company’s outlook remains constructive for the rest of the year as it is entering a leading foundry’s packaging supply chain with a customised metrology tool.

Meanwhile, Elite Material (EMC), the global leader in high-speed copper-clad laminates (CCLs), reported earnings 7% ahead of Bloomberg consensus. EMC’s tailwinds came from strong demand for higher-priced CCLs, predominantly used in Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) servers, which drove a 70% YoY bottom line acceleration. The reaffirmation of US hyperscalers’ (the end customers for AI servers) capex plans has reinforced EMC’s positive outlook.

The careful refinement of the portfolio has culminated in a deliberate and focused consolidation into 25 high-conviction holdings—companies we believe are best positioned to deliver sustainable, long-term growth. This portfolio is testament to our continued focus on high-quality businesses with deep moats and a strong orientation toward innovation (see section on top holdings below). Throughout periods of market volatility, we have remained disciplined and patient, staying true to our convictions and consistently executing the strategy we set out.

While we monitor macroeconomic developments closely, we adjust our positioning only when we believe such shifts materially affect a company’s long-term investment case. Underscoring our confidence in the strategy, the investment team increased its own commitment to the trust during the recent market pullback—demonstrating strong alignment with long-term shareholders. Much like the rebounds that followed challenging periods in 2019 and 2022, we view 2025 in a similar light. With improving visibility into the remainder of the year, we believe there is good potential for continued recovery, despite ongoing volatility and near-term challenges.

Outlook

Looking ahead, U.S. trade policies continue to inject a persistent sense of uncertainty and volatility into the economic outlook for the coming months. The initial 90-day reciprocal tariff pause—subsequently extended by an additional month—was designed to create space for the U.S. to negotiate new trade agreements. Yet, progress has been limited. To date, only the United Kingdom, Vietnam, Indonesia and China – though limited in scope – have reached accords, highlighting the limited effectiveness of a strategy centred around economic pressure.

We continue to monitor the potential impact of heightened tariffs on our portfolio. However, direct exposure seems to be modest. Firstly, a large portion of our technology exposure is based in the software-as-a-service industry, and as services, these are not subject to tariffs.

Secondly, our remaining tech holdings, primarily in the semiconductor and hardware sectors, which are largely currently exempt from tariffs, generate only a limited share of their direct revenue from the U.S. market.

Thirdly, we favour business models oriented towards domestic consumption in select geographies, such as India, which similarly have minimal direct exposure to the U.S. Nonetheless, we continuously monitor the potential broader impact of the seemingly erratic U.S. policies on our portfolio.

MMIT Consumer Exposure Skewed Toward Domestic Demand

MMIT Tech Holdings Show Low Direct Exposure to the U.S.

More broadly, the U.S. may be absorbing greater-than-expected fallout: rising inflation, weaker growth and confidence, and a softening dollar suggest a reversal in the decade-long USD strength—potentially a tailwind for emerging markets. With EM inflows rebounding ($19.2bn in May, tracked by the Institute of International Finance (IIF)), and a shift away from concentrated U.S. exposure, we believe our portfolio is well positioned to benefit.

* The Company has selected the following eight companies from the AIC’s Global Emerging Markets sector to form its peer group. These were chosen based on alignment with the Company’s own investment universe, excluding a small number of regionally focused trusts with narrower mandates. The selected peers are: Ashoka WhiteOak
Emerging Markets (not in graph above as no 5 year track record), Barings Emerging EMEA Opportunities, Fidelity Emerging Markets Limited, BlackRock Frontiers Investment Trust, JP Morgan Emerging Markets Investment Trust, JP Morgan Global Emerging Markets Income Trust, Templeton Emerging Markets Investment Trust,
and Utilico Emerging Markets Trust.