Category: mcp-specific

  • MEMF Q3 2025 Manager Commentary

    MEMF Q3 2025 Manager Commentary

    ”It’s not what happens to you, but how you react that matters.”

    Epictetus

    Dear Fellow MEMF Shareholder,

    This year reminded us what active investing truly means — to act when necessary, to be patient when appropriate, and to hold conviction when it stands tested, revisited, and reaffirmed under new circumstances.

    Active investing can also mean diverging from the market — sometimes sharply. That divergence can be uncomfortable in the short term, as it has been this year, but it is also what drives long-term results. By definition, active investing means being different from the benchmark, taking positions built on conviction, not composition, and aiming to deliver differentiated and sustainable returns. In previous years, the same approach led to significant outperformance, and we believe it has once again left the portfolio better positioned for what lies ahead. Our focus remains unchanged: we aim to invest in high-quality, well managed companies that compound value over time and align with our strategy and responsible investment principles.

    Portfolio companies have shown the same proactive spirit. CarTrade for example, expanded through the OLX integration and doubled its user reach; E Ink committed to new capacity for next-generation displays; TOTVS continued to build on its strategic acquisition of StoneCo’s Linx unit to strengthen its leadership in enterprise retail software; and Park Systems continued to broaden its nanotechnology tools across industries, just to name a few.

    This spirit and innovation is clearly paying off as companies across the portfolio have delivered strong Q2 reports with many beating expectation and upgrading their outlooks for the coming years. CarTrade’s revenue increased by 22% YoY and Profit After Tax increased 106% YoY; E Ink’s revenue increased by 35% YoY and gross margin increased by 60% (+15pp); TOTVS’ earnings beat their EPS estimate by +1.6%; and Park Systems’ revenue increased by 17% YoY, 5% ahead of Bloomberg consensus.

    Fundamentals Should Drive Recovery: Q2 2025 Reports

    Source: MCP, Bloomberg, company source. Figures refer to past performance. Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

    Despite these strong company-level results, this year has been challenging, with gains concentrated in benchmark-heavy countries and sectors. Tariff-related uncertainty in the first half of the year pushed investors toward “safe havens,” while in emerging markets, value outperformed quality as capital rotated into lower-valuation, more defensive sectors like financials amid EM rate cuts. A defence-led rally boosted industrials, and China’s stimulus- and liquidity-driven rebound lifted the benchmark.

    Meanwhile, our overweight in software weighed on performance as companies delayed IT projects in a volatile environment. In general, much of the rally in emerging markets this year has been driven by a handful of mega-cap stocks, while less-known companies have attracted less investor attention. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index is up approximately 28% year-to-date, with internal analysis suggesting that the top ten Asian technology names account for almost half of these gains1.

    In Q2, we began to see early signs of a potential reversal, indicating that recent portfolio headwinds may have been cyclical. This view is cautiously supported by improving macro conditions — including easing tariff volatility, momentum in AI and technology, further interest rate cuts, and a declining USD — as well as country-specific catalysts in India, Taiwan, Korea, and Brazil. While these factors could provide a more supportive backdrop, we expect any recovery to become clearer over the course of next year as these trends gradually come into play.

    The quarter began with renewed tariff uncertainty as President Trump again delayed the implementation of reciprocal tariffs, allowing time for several major trade deals to be struck with the EU, Korea, and Japan. Finally, tariffs took effect on 1 August across more than 90 countries, hitting India and Brazil hardest at 50%. Since then, trade-related volatility has eased, and markets have reacted less sharply to new tariff announcements than earlier in the year, when smaller emerging-market stocks were disproportionately affected as investors rotated into larger, lower-valued names and other perceived safe-haven assets amid heightened uncertainty.

    EM Quality has Fallen Behind EM Value YTD

    Source: Bloomberg. As of 30 September 2025.

    During the early-year volatility, we increased our exposure to existing high-conviction names and selectively added new names from our watchlist by taking advantage of attractive valuations and temporary dislocations from companies that we believe were unfairly impacted by broader market sentiment. With tariff related volatility likely subsiding, quality names, should now be better placed for a recovery.

    The technology sector once again outperformed most other sectors globally, driving gains in both the US and China. Strong Q2 results from US hyperscalers and confirmation of continued large-scale AI capital expenditure reignited confidence in AI-led growth. To put this into perspective, the Guardian reported that Big Tech has invested more than $155 billion in AI this year2 — roughly equivalent to the cost of building the International Space Station. Meanwhile, policy support for domestic chipmakers and new AI product launches from China’s leading technology firms have fuelled a rally in Chinese and Hong Kong tech stocks.

    Hyperscaler Capex Driving AI Momentum

    Source: CL Taiwan, Daiwa.

    This strength in US and Chinese technology has also supported companies, including many in our portfolio, in emerging markets like Taiwan and South Korea which play vital roles in AI supply chains. For example, NVIDIA’s Rubin GPU rollout and rising ASIC volumes are boosting demand across the semiconductor supply chain, benefitting companies such as Elite Material, a global leader in high-performance copper clad laminates used in printed circuit boards. In its Q2 report, Elite announced an additional round of capacity expansion in 2026 due to strong demand, with revenue up 40% YoY. Other examples include Chroma raising its guidance for system-level testing revenue in light of rising demand from leading ASIC and GPU projects.

    Other positive macro news for emerging markets comes in the form of the Federal Reserve’s first interest rate cut of the year this September, with rates now targeted at 4-4.25%. Fed officials also hinted that further rate cuts would follow in the remainder of the year. Lower US interest rates tend to benefit emerging markets by making lower yielding developed market assets less attractive, potentially prompting investors to seek higher returns in EMs some of which are also experiencing moderating local inflation, lower public debts and higher real rates. This can boost foreign direct investment and support EM asset prices. However, the impact is uneven, as greater risk appetite and lower US yields cannot fully offset weak macroeconomic conditions or poor corporate fundamentals in certain markets. Nevertheless, the continuation of the downward trajectory of global rate cuts should be positive for emerging markets overall.

    Within our key markets, local factors are at play indicating the potential for country-level recoveries. Taiwan should benefit from the global AI momentum mentioned above with its global leadership in advanced semiconductors underpinning both industry demand and geopolitical importance. Korea should profit from a semiconductor recovery, as well as governance reforms and its Value Up initiative which is creating potential to unlock shareholder value by improving governance and capital allocation.

    Meanwhile, India’s combination of fiscal prudence, resilient domestic consumption grounded in a young population, moderating inflation, and pro-growth policy support creates a constructive macro backdrop underpinning the country’s long term, high growth trajectory. In Brazil, while we expect volatility ahead of the 2026 elections, there is a clear path towards SELIC rate cuts and normalisation of real interest rates which would provide a catalyst for the Brazilian equities market.

    China Rally Driven by Multiple Expansion, Not EPS Growth

    Source: Macquarie.

    While China has dominated headlines this year with a strong market rebound placing it among the top-performing countries, we believe the rally has been driven primarily by sentiment and policy stimulus, rather than underlying fundamentals, as reflected in persistently weak economic data this quarter. The lack of a clear recovery in the real economy raises questions about the rally’s sustainability. Additionally, the rally has been largely concentrated in the tech sector which is now trading at less attractive valuations. For these reasons, we continue to exercise caution. We have been carefully screening the Chinese market across select sectors to identify companies that meet our stringent quality and governance standards. While only a few appear potentially aligned with these criteria, we remain disciplined and will continue our search without compromising on quality.

    Overall, as we reflect on the year, we are reminded of Epictetus’ words: “It’s not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters.” While this year has presented significant challenges, it has only strengthened our conviction in both our strategy and our portfolio companies. Rather than being discouraged by volatility, we used it as an opportunity to deepen our positions in high-quality, well-managed businesses.

    By staying disciplined and true to our active, conviction-driven approach, we believe we are now well positioned to benefit from key macro, country and sector specific tailwinds over the coming years. Reflecting this confidence, the team has increased its investment in the strategy — a clear signal of our optimism about the future of our portfolio companies and the opportunities ahead in emerging markets which we intend to capitalise on.

    1. Bloomberg, MSCI ↩︎
    2. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/02/big-tech-ai-spending ↩︎

  • MEMF Q2 2025 Manager Commentary

    MEMF Q2 2025 Manager Commentary

    Dear fellow MEMF shareholder,

    Throughout the past quarter—and indeed the entire year—we have experienced significant market volatility, driven in large part by shifting U.S. trade policies under the Trump administration, which have fuelled considerable uncertainty. Volatility peaked following the 2 April announcement of extraordinarily high, sweeping ‘reciprocal’ tariffs. This announcement shocked global markets, triggering sharp selloffs with some of the steepest price movements in decades. The subsequent pause of the tariffs to 9 July seemed only to confirm the erratic nature of U.S. policies, a sentiment further validated by the recent extension to 1 August.

    Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions—including the ongoing war in the Ukraine and the escalating conflict in the Middle East—have added further layers of complexity to the global macro environment. Several emerging markets have faced their own significant challenges: India experienced a sharp market downturn in January and February; South Korea continued to navigate political instability following last year’s failed attempt to impose martial law; and Turkey came under renewed pressure after the arrest of President Erdogan’s main opposition leader. Finally, the surprise release of the Chinese chatbot DeepSeek introduced unexpected competitive dynamics in the global AI landscape, further unsettling investor sentiment.

    Smaller, high-quality companies, particularly in the technology sector, were disproportionately affected by the uncertainty as investors fled to safe heaven assets like gold but also to the larger, more liquid names deemed to be less risky. Furthermore, amidst the volatility, we observed a market rotation into sectors such as banks and commodities. These areas, which we deliberately exclude from the portfolio due to their regulatory complexity, capital intensity, and limited pricing power, had already been trading at low valuations and therefore proved more resilient during recent market corrections.

    Our portfolio is benchmark-agnostic, with an active share close to 100%, reflecting our high-conviction, bottom-up stock selection. While this naturally leads to periods of return divergence against the broader market, we believe it positions us well to deliver meaningful long-term outperformance.

    We’ve navigated challenging periods before, such as in 2019 and 2022, and in both instances, the fund went on to deliver strong (out-)performance in the years that followed. As the dislocation begins to correct, MEMF’s NAV has started to recover, delivering 11.8% (Private C Founder USD) and 2.7% (Private C Founder EUR) terms over the quarter. Since inception, the fund has delivered a return of 49% (Private C Founder USD).

    We viewed the recent market pullback as an opportunity to further strengthen the portfolio. We selectively added high-conviction names from our watchlist, taking advantage of attractive valuations and temporary dislocations. Active portfolio management has remained central to our day-to-day work: we trimmed or exited positions where, in our view, the macro environment had materially weakened the investment case and redeployed capital into more compelling opportunities. At the same time, we increased exposure to several high-conviction holdings that had been unfairly impacted by broader market sentiment. Encouragingly, many of our portfolio companies delivered strong Q1 results, with several beating expectations and issuing positive forward guidance, despite ongoing uncertainty.

    Strong Q1 Results, Optimistic Outlook for 2025 & Beyond

    Source: MCP, Bloomberg, company source. Figures refer to past performance.
    Past performance is not a guide to future performance.

    Our extensive on-the-ground research this year—spanning visits to Taiwan, India and Korea—provided valuable insight and generated a number of promising new ideas. India stands out as a particularly strong focus for us. We took advantage of market weakness earlier this year to add undervalued names, supported by an improving macro backdrop that includes rate cuts, easing inflation, and increased liquidity in the banking sector.

    Economic Indicators Point to Continued Recovery in India

    Source: Statista, Trading Economics, Analyst research.

    In Korea, the outcome of the 3 June elections brought political stability, which has boosted stock performance. The new government is pursuing a broad agenda of market-friendly reforms, not only to tackle the longstanding ‘Korea discount’, but also to enhance overall corporate governance, capital efficiency, and investor confidence. As a result, new opportunities are emerging, particularly in the technology sector. Brazil has also remained on our radar, with compellingly low valuations, improving macro fundamentals, and a strengthening real contributing to a more constructive outlook.

    From a sector perspective, we have been active as well. In health care, we began reducing our position in Korean medical aesthetics company Classys after realising significant profits over the course of the holding period. In industrials, we added to APL Apollo and bought KEI Industries in India to capitalise on Indian infra and energy capex demands.

    In consumer discretionary, we added CarTrade given its dominant position in car classifieds in India catering towards local consumption growth. We remain bullish on the technology sector; however, the composition of our tech holdings has been thoughtfully realigned to reflect our evolving views amid current macroeconomic challenges, broader market trends, and shifting IT spending priorities.

    Country/Sector Allocation Changes YTD

    Source: Bloomberg, MCP. MEMF (December): as of 31 December 2024.
    MEMF (June): as of 30 June 2025.

    After the ‘DeepSeek scare’—when a Chinese artificial intelligence start-up launched a high-performing model at lower cost—first-quarter results from Amazon and Alphabet confirmed strong momentum in artificial intelligence investment. Businesses are rapidly shifting to artificial intelligence-driven models, requiring continued large-scale investment in computing infrastructure.

    Encouragingly, many of our portfolio companies in the technology sector echoed this trend in their Q1 earnings reports, providing constructive guidance for the year ahead and pointing to an emerging rebound in demand, driven by renewed strength in AI-related spending.

    For example, Chroma, a Taiwanese supplier of testing equipment, beat Bloomberg earnings consensus by 48% driven by a 11% increase in operating margin year-on-year, and a 55% year-on-year revenue growth. Demand for Chroma’s power testers was supported by China’s aggressive AI datacentre build out, and the company’s outlook remains constructive for the rest of the year as it is entering a leading foundry’s packaging supply chain with a customised metrology tool.

    Meanwhile, Elite Material (EMC), the global leader in high-speed copper-clad laminates (CCLs), reported earnings 7% ahead of Bloomberg consensus. EMC’s tailwinds came from strong demand for higher-priced CCLs, predominantly used in Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) servers, which drove a 70% YoY bottom line acceleration. The reaffirmation of US hyperscalers’ (the end customers for AI servers) capex plans has reinforced EMC’s positive outlook.

    The careful refinement of the portfolio has culminated in a deliberate and focused consolidation into 29 high-conviction holdings—companies we believe are best positioned to deliver sustainable, long-term growth. This portfolio is testament to our continued focus on high-quality businesses with deep moats and a strong orientation toward innovation. Throughout periods of market volatility, we have remained disciplined and patient, staying true to our convictions and executing the strategy we set out.

    While we monitor macroeconomic developments closely, we adjust our positioning only when we believe such shifts materially affect a company’s long-term investment case. Underscoring our confidence in the strategy, the team increased its own commitment to the fund during the recent market pullback—demonstrating strong alignment with long-term shareholders. Much like the rebounds that followed challenging periods in 2019 and 2022, we view 2025 in a similar light. With improving visibility into the remainder of the year, we believe there is good potential for continued recovery, despite ongoing volatility and near-term challenges.

    Outlook

    Looking ahead, U.S. trade policies continue to inject a persistent sense of uncertainty and volatility into the economic outlook for the coming months. The initial 90-day reciprocal tariff pause—subsequently extended by an additional month—was designed to create space for the U.S. to negotiate new trade agreements. Yet, progress has been limited. To date, only the United Kingdom, Vietnam, Indonesia and China – though limited in scope – have reached accords, highlighting the limited effectiveness of a strategy centred around economic pressure.

    We continue to monitor the potential impact of heightened tariffs on our portfolio. However, direct exposure seems to be modest. Firstly, a large portion of our technology exposure is based in the software-as-a-service industry, and as services, these are not subject to tariffs.

    Secondly, our remaining tech holdings, primarily in the semiconductor and hardware sectors, which are largely currently exempt from tariffs, generate only a limited share of their direct revenue from the U.S. market.

    Thirdly, we favour business models oriented towards domestic consumption in select geographies, such as India, which similarly have minimal direct exposure to the U.S. Nonetheless, we continuously monitor the potential broader impact of the seemingly erratic U.S. policies on our portfolio.

    MEMF Consumer Exposure Skewed Toward Domestic Demand

    Source: Bloomberg, MCP. As of 30 June 2025. Revenue data for FY2024.

    MEMF Tech Holdings Show Low Direct Exposure to the U.S.

    Source: Bloomberg, MCP. As of 30 June 2025. Revenue data for FY2024. Actual exposure through direct shipments is significantly lower than revenue exposure (e.g., Taiwan equipment maker shipping to OSATs and receiving revenue from US customer).

    More broadly, the U.S. may be absorbing greater-than-expected fallout: rising inflation, weaker growth and confidence, and a softening dollar suggest a reversal in the decade-long USD strength—potentially a tailwind for emerging markets. With EM inflows rebounding ($19.2bn in May, tracked by the Institute of International Finance (IIF)), and a shift away from concentrated U.S. exposure, we believe our portfolio is well positioned to benefit.

  • MEMF Strategy Update Webinar July 2025

    On 9 July 2025, MCP Emerging Markets hosted a Zoom webinar where founding partner Carlos Hardenberg and investment analyst Swati Mehta provided an update on the strategy, performance and portfolio of the Mobius Emerging Markets Fund (MEMF).

    The video below is a replay of the webinar.

    Please email Anna von Hahn at anna@mcp-em.com should you have any questions or would like further information.

    For professional investors only. Capital at risk.

  • Assessing the Portfolio Impact of Recent Tariff Announcements 

    Uncertainty and shock over the reciprocal tariffs announced on ‘Liberation Day’ by the new US administration has, to put it bluntly, created market chaos. The sharp global sell-offs are reminiscent of the turmoil experienced during the Covid-19 pandemic. As was the case then, few have been spared. Trump’s recent decision to delay reciprocal tariffs for 90 days applicable to any country that has not retaliated, has provided markets with what appears to be a temporary lifeline 

    However, we do not interpret this as a signal that markets have bottomed, nor do we assume this policy will necessarily hold given Trump’s unpredictability. Rather, this move appears to reflect a form of targeted pressure—some might say economic bullying—directed against China, particularly given that it remains the only country to have retaliated thus far. As a result, market confidence has been deeply shaken and we can expect elevated volatility and uncertainty to persist in the coming months. 

    Like many, we had anticipated the possibility of rising protectionism under a second Trump administration, though not to the extent we seem to be witnessing now. In recent months, we have proactively assessed the potential impact of higher tariffs on our portfolio. Each individual position has been carefully reviewed under this assumption, and we continue to re-evaluate our holdings in light of the evolving situation.  

    As far as the direct impact of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs is concerned, we believe companies exporting physical goods to the U.S. from countries facing the steepest approved tariff increases are likely to be most affected. Fortunately, although our portfolio includes companies based in several of these countries—which could be hit hard if the announced ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs are fully implemented—our current assessment suggests the immediate impact on our holdings may be limited. Many of our portfolio companies have minimal direct export exposure to the affected sectors, providing a degree of insulation from near-term disruption. 

    Take Classys, a Korean medical device manufacturer facing a potential 32% tariff on its U.S. imports. The company derives less than 5% of its revenue from sales to the U.S., significantly reducing the potential impact on overall earnings. The bulk of its revenue, approximately 35%, comes from the domestic Korean market, while Europe and Southeast Asia each contribute around 20%. Japan and Brazil account for roughly 10% each, providing further geographic diversification.

    Additionally, the top three US-revenue exposed companies in our portfolio are asset-light, IP-based software companies. As a services industry, they are not directly targeted by the new tariffs. Furthermore, semiconductors are currently excluded from the newly announced tariffs. But the situation remains highly fluid. While chips themselves are not directly taxed, components that contain them, such as laptops and smartphones, had been at risk of future levies. However, over the weekend, the White House appeared to grant temporary exemptions for certain electronics, including smartphones, laptops, hard drives and flat-panel monitors. At the same time, a Section 232 investigation into semiconductor imports has been launched, raising the prospect of targeted tariffs based on national security grounds. We are closely monitoring developments in this sector, as it remains a potential flashpoint in the broader trade narrative. 

    Finally, we also prioritise business models oriented towards domestic consumption in select markets. As a result, our consumer holdings have minimal direct exposure to U.S. demand, with the exception being a Turkish apparel retailer, which derives less than 5% of its revenue from the U.S. 

    Beyond the direct taxation of goods, few businesses are likely to escape the broader, more insidious effects of escalating tariffs. Even in cases where companies are not directly targeted, tariff-induced slowdowns in demand and profitability can ripple through global supply chains, dampening investment sentiment and tightening margins. These second-order effects pose significant risks—not just to individual companies, but to entire economies. From shifts in consumer spending patterns to declining trade volumes and tightening financial conditions, the cumulative pressure could contribute to a broader global economic slowdown. We are actively assessing these cross-currents as we evaluate portfolio exposure and position for resilience. 

    In the meantime, the trade war between the US and China has exploded into full force. At the time of writing, the US has imposed tariffs of 145% on Chinese imports, while China has responded with tariffs of 125% on US goods. Who knows how much higher these could go.  This extreme tariff war between the US and China alone will have serious repercussions across the global economy. 

    Amidst the chaos here are some glimmers of light on the tariff horizon. It’s worth remembering that we’ve been through a Trump-led trade war before, and global trade patterns had already begun to shift well before the current escalation. One of the most important structural changes over the past few decades has been the rise of South-South trade, particularly across Asia. Between 2007 and 2023, trade among developing countries more than doubled, from $2.3 trillion to $5.6 trillion, largely driven by Asia1. Intra-Asia trade alone is projected to grow from $4.3 trillion in 2023 to $7.1 trillion by 20302

    This diversification accelerated following the 2018 U.S.-China trade war, prompting countries to reduce reliance on U.S. imports. For example, China’s share of exports to the U.S. declined from 19% in 2017 to 14.7% in 20243. At the same time, many countries have been pursuing bilateral and regional trade deals that exclude the U.S. Notably, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), signed in 2020, includes 15 Asia-Pacific nations and covers around 28% of global trade. 

    Although the U.S. will remain a dominant global importer, the accelerating pivot away from dependence on its market places many economies in a stronger position to withstand rising U.S. tariffs. We expect this trend to continue gaining momentum in light of recent developments, as countries intensify efforts to expand trade partnerships beyond the U.S. 

    In this uncertain environment, our top priority is to stay close to our portfolio companies and continuously reassess our investment theses in light of new insights and ongoing dialogue with stakeholders. To that end, we have scheduled additional research travel to remain close to developments on the ground and ensure we are ready to adapt swiftly as conditions evolve—especially given the many unknowns that remain, including the durability of the 90-day pause and the potential for new trade deals. 

    We believe experience and steadiness are vital during periods of heightened volatility. The MCP team has been through many market cycles, including the Asian financial crisis, the global financial crisis, and—during MCP’s own tenure—the Covid-19 pandemic. Since our launch in 2018, amid the first U.S.-China trade war, we believe we have guided the fund through an extraordinary period marked by global disruption, rising geopolitical tensions, inflationary shocks, tech sector uncertainty, and the renewed political ascent of Donald Trump. 

    Today’s surge in market volatility bears strong resemblance, in our view, to the dislocation seen in early 2020, when fear overtook fundamentals. At that time, we believe the team responded swiftly and strategically repositioning the portfolio to take advantage of market dislocations and initiating positions in high-quality companies from our watch list. These were businesses with sound fundamentals and durable models, which we believed were being unduly punished by market sentiment. 

    We believe this timely and deliberate response, combined with the quality of our portfolio holdings—characterised by competitive strength, solid balance sheets, robust corporate governance, and leadership in innovation—was a key contributor to the fund’s strong outperformance. By 14 September 2020, just 241 days after the Covid-related market peak, MEMF (Private C USD Founder) had recovered its losses. From the trough to the subsequent peak on 16 November 2021, the fund delivered a return of 136.5% over a 603-day period, before concerns around global rate hikes began to weigh on broader markets. 

    As long-term investors, we view the current environment through a similar lens. We do not believe this is a time to retreat, but rather an opportunity to build positions in resilient companies with strong fundamentals—businesses we believe are well-positioned to benefit from a long-term recovery particularly as history shows that the subsequent bull market tends to outperform its preceding bear market.

     

    1 UNCTAD

    2 HSBC Forecast

    3 FT Analysis

  • MEMF Strategy Update Webinar March 2025

    For Professional Investors only

    On 18 March 2025, MCP Emerging Markets hosted a Zoom webinar where founding partner Carlos Hardenberg and investment analyst Swathi Seshadri provided an update on the strategy, performance and portfolio of the Mobius Emerging Markets Fund (MEMF).

    The video below is a replay of the webinar.

    Please email Anna von Hahn at anna@mcp-em.com should you have any questions or would like further information.

  • RECORDING: MEMF Strategy Update Webinar July 2024

    RECORDING: MEMF Strategy Update Webinar July 2024

    For Professional Investors only

    On 3 July, Mobius Capital Partners hosted a Zoom webinar where founding partner Carlos Hardenberg and investment analysts Florian Hofmann and Swathi Seshadri provided an update on the strategy, performance and portfolio of the Mobius Emerging Markets Fund.

    The video below is a replay of the webinar.

    Please email Anna von Hahn at anna@mcp-em.com should you have any questions or would like further information.

  • Mobius Emerging Markets Fund classified as Article 8 Fund

    ‍We are delighted to share with you that the CSSF (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier) has approved the classification of the Mobius Emerging Markets Fund as an Article 8 fund. According to the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), an Article 8 fund is “a fund which promotes, among other characteristics, environmental or social characteristics, or a combination of those characteristics, provided that the companies in which the investments are made follow good governance practices”.

    The SFDR was introduced as part of the European Commission’s 2018 Sustainable Finance Action Plan to improve transparency in the market for sustainable investment products and to prevent greenwashing. It regulates the requirements for financial service providers and owners of financial products to assess and disclose environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations publicly. The aim is to enable investors to better understand, compare and monitor the sustainability characteristics of investment products.

    As a quick reminder, MCP’s investment philosophy utilises an active ownership approach with an emphasis on improving ESG-standards. We do not constrain ourselves to conventional definitions of ESG but also place a heavy emphasis on rigorously assessing corporate culture (ESG+C®). Our engagement with companies is highly focused, with the aim of increasing long-term shareholder value.

    While we are happy to see the fund achieve the Article 8 status and the team’s engagement around improving ESG+C® factors being recognised, the process has also revealed the limitations of this framework. To be able to distribute Article 8 funds to investors with a preference for sustainability as per MiFID II, in addition to promoting environmental and social characteristics, funds will have to invest a percentage of their portfolio sustainably similarly to an Article 9 fund. This triggers additional reporting requirements. The SFDR-mandated disclosure on Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) factors focuses on possible harm that investment decisions may have on sustainability factors. Examples of PAI factors include greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water pollution and gender diversity at the board level.

    The difficulty for emerging markets funds in general—and small- and mid-cap funds in particular–is limited data availability. While many developed market companies are publishing GRI compliant sustainability reports and are on the radar of ESG rating agencies, EM companies are still lagging behind. Furthermore, the EU Commission promotes SFDR aligned reporting for EU-based companies but there is no comparable initiative in emerging markets yet. While the awareness of the importance of sustainability factors is constantly growing in emerging markets, reporting on a set of 14 PAI indicators across the portfolio will prove challenging.

    The team at MCP has created a proprietary framework that uses a variety of publicly available sources to capture material data to assess the ESG+C® performance of each portfolio company. It also engages with companies to improve and make their ESG reporting compliant. The progress the portfolio is making along ESG parameters is tracked in our quarterly reporting. The latest Q3 2022 report is now available on www.esgplusc.com. This data feeds into a tailored action plan for every portfolio holding aiming at improving the companies ESG+C footprint.

    This very customised approach to sustainable investing goes, in our opinion, far beyond a reliance on ESG-ratings. We do not invest in companies which are already ESG leaders but in businesses which have the potential to become such, and we support them actively throughout this process. We would argue that working with these companies on improving their ESG footprint and making their reporting SFDR compliant adds significant shareholder value while reducing potential harm to the environment, employees and other stake holders. This in turn, should make the fund an attractive investment option for investors with sustainability preferences as per MiFID II. However, it remains challenging for a fund like ours to fulfil the data requirements stipulated by the SFDR for sustainable investments for a significant portion of the portfolio.‍‍

    Footnote: As per SFDR definition, a sustainable investment is an economic activity that contributes to an environmental or social objective.Image: unsplash.com